Written: 12/21/2013 Edited: 4/2/2017
The history of bioeletronic implants began well over one hundred years ago, with the invention of rather primitive cochlear implants. These devices, even in the late 1950s, could restore some semblance of a sense of hearing, to the amazement of many and the consternation of more than a few. It seems that bioelectronics has always been a controversial field, even before it was called bioelectronics.
The history of bioeletronic implants began well over one hundred years ago, with the invention of rather primitive cochlear implants. These devices, even in the late 1950s, could restore some semblance of a sense of hearing, to the amazement of many and the consternation of more than a few. It seems that bioelectronics has always been a controversial field, even before it was called bioelectronics.
For the first few decades, these
cochlear implants were the only bioelectronic implants that existed
in the mainstream. Research progressed beyond that, of course. The
chief areas of interest in the field were to restore function to
other senses and to limbs. However, it was a long time before any of
these devices could be refined beyond the experimental stage. At the
turn of the century, though, the field of bioelectronics turned a
corner. The second half-century of research proved much more
fruitful than the first half, and a much greater variety of devices
became widely available to patients of even moderate means.
My birth came near the end of that
period, and so I do not really remember any of it. Perhaps I
remember family vacations from that time, or birthday gifts, or an
especially bad skinned knee. Then again, perhaps those are only
invented memories. In either case, as a child of that age, I did not
know the first thing about bioelectronics, and so of that, I have
nothing to remember.
My recollections span a different
transitional period. Even when I was young, bioelectronics were
being implanted as early as birth. These were optional procedures to
fix certain congenital defects that were discovered during pregnancy,
or even to enhance certain talents if parents had the inclination and
the resources. There were even a few devices that had been developed
as “safety features” to protect other people from a misbehaved
and destructive child, though I can't imagine what kind of parents
would have chosen to install such a thing in their newborn baby way
back in the 60s. At that time, the mere mention of bioelectronic
implants was enough to provoke outrage in certain people. That was
only a vocal minority, but they were registered and avid voters, and
they were very vocal.
By the time my two boys arrived,
bioelectronics were standard, as much a part of childbirth as the
Lamaze method and the Apgar test.
My two little boys: Phil, age six, and
Dirk, age five. They are part of the first generation of children to
go to school in a classroom full of cyborgs, although it's hard to
think of my own children that way. My two little boys: Phil and
Dirk. They mean so much to Alex and me that it's hard to think of
them as normal. But that's what they are: perfectly normal. Or at
least they were, up until a year ago.
It was around that time that their
teachers began to notice that their development had slowed somewhat.
Their homework was sometimes being returned incomplete, and sometimes
they had trouble answering some of the teachers' questions. Though
it still seemed to me that they were growing up so fast, they were no
longer growing as quickly as most of the other children. Phil and
Dirk had always hovered around the 60th or 70th
percentile for both height and weight, but had slipped from
above-average to below-average. Now, both of them are the smallest
in their class.
Eventually, the school advised that we
take Phil and Dirk to see a doctor, so of course we did. The doctors
couldn't find anything wrong with them, any underlying cause. They
were perfectly healthy boys (and they still are), they were just not
developing as quickly as their peers. The doctors told us that
sometimes this just happens, for no particular reason and with nobody
in particular at fault. I myself had been the smallest in my class
until a late growth spurt at the age of 19, and Alex is still quite
small. Neither of us were scholarship students, either, although I
was a late bloomer academically, too. If this is who Phil and Dirk
are, neither of us will love them any less for it.
So the doctors sent us home, and that
was the end of it, as far as they were concerned. There was no
injury or illness, which meant there was nothing for them to worry
about. Just not being average, all by itself, is not an abnormality.
The teachers, who had a more personal relationship with our boys,
were only mostly reassured by what they heard from the doctors. They
were still a little bit concerned. Just to make sure, they set up a
visit from Children's Services.
It wasn't intended to be a surprise
visit. They told us that when they got here, although after what
transpired, we didn't really believe that. It turned out that the
notice had somehow gotten lost in processing, and ended up arriving
two weeks after the social worker did. When the doorbell rang, Phil
and Dirk were sitting listlessly in front of the television, Alex was
watching them, overcome by loving adoration, and I was in the kitchen
with flour all over my hands.
Alex let the woman from Children's
Services in, and her eyes fell immediately upon Phil and Dirk. “They
just fell asleep in front of the TV after a long day at school,”
Alex told her. “Don't turn it off or you'll wake them up.” The
lady picked up the remote control and turned the television off.
Neither Phil nor Dirk stirred. Now the woman started to say
something, but Alex interrupted. “I think it would be better if
you didn't disturb them. They need their rest.”
The woman from Children's Services
hardly paused a second before bending down to about eye level with
the children. “Phil.” she said firmly. “Dirk?” Neither
one stirred. Now the woman moved to touch the boys.
“Do you have to?” Alex asked.
“They're just so beautiful when they sleep. Couldn't you just
leave them be?” The woman put one hand on each boy and shook them
lightly by the shoulder. Still, neither one woke. Dirk did slump
forward, though, revealing the back of his neck–and revealing that
neither of the boys was asleep at all.
Strictly speaking, they had been
'turned off.'
This bioelectric implant was originally
one of those optional safety features that had been introduced back
in the '60s. The idea was that it would be a non-injurious way of
calming a destructive child or restraining one in a self-defense or a
police arrest situation. And in fact it was non-injurious. Studies
have repeatedly shown that turning a child off does her no harm at
all.
There have been a lot of studies, too.
There is a lot of data available. While this particular safety
feature had originally been created for the benefit of others, almost
every parent today uses it exclusively for the benefit of the child
herself. The switch on the back of the neck has become a detour
around any sort of painful or traumatic event in a young child's
life, the kind that has the potential to affect the child
psychologically. People who are 'turned off' don't remember a thing.
Even into adulthood, the switch is useful for keeping injured people
from struggling against painful but necessary first-responder
treatment, or even just for preventing them from injuring themselves
further in sheer panic.
There's no logical reason to use the
switch on someone who is just lounging in front of a television, of
course. But it turns out that life is not always logical. People
certainly aren't. So one day almost two years ago, when Phil and
Dirk were sitting in front of the TV watching football and arguing
about the relative merits of Barcelona's club and New York's, I
mentioned that they were growing up so quickly. Was it then logical
for Alex to grow morose, agitated, and then finally angry about how
soon they would be moody preteens, and then independent
upperclassmen, and then finally leave altogether? It probably was
not. Was it logical for me to turn them off when I realized we were
about to have an argument? I would like think so.
I'm not sure if the idea to leave them
off was logic, or mere desperation. When people are 'turned off,' their bodies enter a state of very minimal activity. In that state,
they don't have enough metabolic activity to grow. The reduced
metabolism also slows aging. Turned off for half of every day, a
person's childhood would double in length. That was the idea. And
Alex looked so happy just to watch them. I didn't have the heart to
quit.
Once the Children's Services woman had
calmed down a bit, there was nothing I could do but confess this to
her. That of course got me sent up for a little while, but they're
letting me out today. The switch is completely harmless, so my
repeated use of it doesn't meet any legal definition of abuse. Once
the state determined that, they had no choice but to declare me
innocent of any wrongdoing and secure my release.
I'm not sure what I'll do now.
Children's Services has ordered me to comply with a newly-created set
of emergency procedures for using the switch, and the law against
ignoring orders prepared by Children's Services is very clear.
I'm afraid that Alex and I will both
miss watching them sleep.
They're going to grow up so fast.
No comments:
Post a Comment